Subcutaneous Insulin Versus Traditional Intravenous Insulin Infusion in Treatment of Mild to Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) insulin infusions are the current standard of care for treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Subcutaneous (SQ) insulin, however, may also be a safe and effective alternative. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare patient-centered outcomes related to the treatment of mild to moderate DKA using two different protocols: an SQ insulin protocol and an IV insulin infusion protocol with an initial bolus (IVB) or without a bolus (IVNB). METHODS: We retrospectively conducted a multicenter cohort study evaluating SQ vs. IV insulin for the treatment of mild to moderate DKA. The primary outcome was time to DKA resolution. Secondary outcomes included time to glucose correction, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, hypoglycemia events, readmission rates, and IV insulin use. RESULTS: Within the study time frame, 257 patients were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. There was no significant difference in the time to DKA resolution between the IVB (p = 0.603) or IVNB (p = 0.269) groups compared with the population who received SQ insulin only. Hospital LOS was significantly longer when comparing the SQ group with the IVNB group (p < 0.001), but not when comparing it with the IVB group (p = 0.259). The IV protocols had significantly more hypoglycemic events compared with the SQ protocol (IVB vs. SQ, p < 0.001; IVNB vs. SQ, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SQ insulin may be an effective alternative option for treating mild to moderate DKA with fewer hypoglycemic effects.

Implementation and Impact of Critical Care Pharmacist Addition to a Telecritical Care Network.

Critical care pharmacists when incorporated into the ICU team, have been shown to improve outcomes in critically ill patients by decreasing mortality, improving morbidity and reducing cost. As telehealth continues to evolve, the incorporation of a critical care pharmacist into a comprehensive telecritical care (TCC) service will allow increased comprehensive pharmacotherapeutic care for those in smaller, community or rural hospitals. OBJECTIVES: To describe the implementation of a TCC pharmacist into an established TCC network, classify interventions performed, and quantify cost avoidance generated through pharmacist interventions. DESIGN: Multicenter, observational cohort study and retrospective return on investment, performed between December 2019 and December 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Critically ill adult patients, admitted to an ICU located in any of our eight community hospitals (50 ICU beds) within a large, 25-hospital integrated healthcare system (563 ICU beds total) in the United States. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The TCC pharmacist service was implemented in 8-hour shifts, initially available 5 days per week, then expanded to 7 days per week. Critical care pharmacist interventions were categorized by clinical type established utilizing American Society of Health-System Pharmacists benchmarking standards and the latest cost avoidance data. RESULTS: During the 2-year analysis period, TCC pharmacists documented 2,838 interventions generating $1,664,254 of gross cost avoidance and a return on investment of 4.5:1. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: It is feasible to implement a TCC pharmacist within an established TCC network. Our experience showed enhanced comprehensive care of critically ill patients located in community hospitals within a large, integrated healthcare system, demonstrated significant cost avoidance, and has led to other initiatives, including a collaborative clinical/operational partnership with Life Flight.

Variables associated with adequate INR reversal in warfarin treated patients receiving 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

Dosing of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) in warfarin treated patients generally utilizes international normalized ratio (INR) and patient weight. The recommended maximum dosing for all INR categories is capped at 100 kg weight. Whether this affects INR reversal is unknown. Furthermore, characteristics associated with adequate INR reversal need to be further elucidated. This was a multi-center, retrospective cohort study of 186 patients who received 4FPCC for INR reversal in the setting of warfarin-associated hemorrhage or need for emergent INR reversal. Utilizing multiple regression analysis, we evaluated INR reversal, achievement of hemostasis, and 28-day all-cause mortality. A target INR < 1.4 was achieved in 132 of 186 patients (71%). Factors significantly affecting the odds of achieving target INR were age in years (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P = 0.01), weight-based 4FPCC dose (units/kg) (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; P = 0.03), and 4FPCC dosing normalized to INR (units/kg/INR) (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.35; P = 0.02). Hemostasis was achieved in 109 of 148 bleeding patients (73.6%). Blood transfusions were associated with not achieving hemostasis (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.93; P = 0.03). All-cause 28-day mortality was 21.5% and was associated with intracranial hemorrhage (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.38-5.8; P = 0.01). Adequate INR reversal was associated with age, weight-based 4FPCC dose, and dosing normalized to INR (units/kg/INR). Future studies should evaluate the appropriateness of current INR targets for warfarin reversal and alternative 4FPCC dosing strategies such as utilizing a 4FPCC dosing ratio of units/kg/INR.

High-dose versus low-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for factor Xa inhibitor reversal in intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) is used off-label for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Guideline recommendations provide various 4FPCC dosing regimens for FXa inhibitor reversal in this setting. We evaluated 4FPCC weight-based dosing and outcomes in FXa inhibitor-associated ICH. METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective, cohort study of ICH patients between July 2017 and February 2020. Patients were greater than 18 years of age, received 4FPCC, and were taking apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban. Patients were separated into high- (≥35 units/kg) or low-dose (<35 units/kg) 4FPCC groups. The primary outcome was hemostasis achievement. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and thrombotic events. Outcomes were evaluated with binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 390 patients identified, 89 were included with 74 and 15 in the high- vs low-dose groups, respectively. Mean (SD) age was 76.6 (±10.8) years. Most were taking a FXa inhibitor for atrial fibrillation (76.4%) and apixaban was the most common FXa inhibitor (65.2%). Hemostasis achievement was greater in the high- vs low-dose group (89.2% vs 46.7%; OR 11.2; 95% CI 2.4-52.6, P = 0.002). Thrombotic events were 8.2% and 6.7% in the high vs low-dose groups, respectively (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.08-8.2, P = 0.87). No statistically significant differences were found in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients with FXa inhibitor-associated ICH, high-dose 4FPCC was associated with increased odds of hemostasis achievement. There was no difference in thrombotic events.

Acid Suppression to Prevent Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The high incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with ventricular assist devices (VAD) is well known, but there is limited evidence to support the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine receptor antagonists (H2RA) for preventing GIB in patients with VAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surgical ICU and VAD databases within a large regional academic cardiac mechanical support and transplant center were queried for patients who underwent VAD implantation between 2010 and 2014. An observational cohort study was conducted to identify which acid suppressing drug regimen was associated with the fewest number of GIB events within 30 d after VAD implantation: PPI, H2RA, or neither. Secondary outcomes included timing, etiology, and location of GIB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare treatment cohorts to GIB. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported from the model. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients were included for final analysis, 19 of which had a GIB within 30 days of VAD implantation. Both H2RA and PPI use were associated with reduced GIB compared with the cohort with no acid suppressive therapy. In the multivariate analysis, the PPI cohort showed a statistically significant reduction in GIB (Odds ratio 0.18 [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.79] P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Using PPI postoperatively in patients with new VAD was associated with a reduced incidence of GIB. Given that GIB is a known complication after VAD placement, clinicians should consider the use of acid suppressive therapy for primary prevention.